Enterprise-wide asset and liability management: Issues, institutions, and models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Publisher Summary This chapter defines enterprise risk management (ERM), describes a conceptual framework for an ERM strategy, and touches upon organizational issues. Asset and liability management (ALM) is then identified as a core activity of ERM for financial institutions. It discusses ALM for various financial institutions, and provides an overview of tools to support ALM activities. Enterprise risk management aligns a firm's business strategy with the risk factors of its environment in pursuit of business objectives. It is considered a well-grounded management strategy for corporations. The management of assets and liabilities is at the core of ERM for financial institutions. In this chapter, we discuss the general framework for ERM, and the role of ALM within this broader strategy. From the general concepts, we proceed to focus on specific financial institutions, and conclude with a discussion of modelling issues that arise in the enterprise-wide management of assets and liabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it