MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991747726

From the Aztecs Their Tax Systems; Of the Incas Their Accounts, And of the Mayas Their Scripture; The Outcome is the Pre-Columbian Accounting (*)

2016· article· en· W2991747726 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Reynaldo Frausto Mena

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesoamericaMayaThrivingAncient historyRepresentation (politics)HistoryQuarter (Canadian coin)EthnologyArchaeologyGeographyAnthropologySociologyPoliticsLawPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On this occasion, I speak as three of the greatest Pre-Columbian cultures theylet us different legacies that manifest such as a whole they exercised their accounting,primarily over who and in what form they practiced this. Also I will expose of thethree different Pre-Columbian cultures, both at space and in time, such as: The Azteca(Mexico), The Inca (Peru), and The Maya (Mexico, Guatemala, Belize, Honduras and El Salvador).I discuss of these Pre-Columbian cultures from these three populationswho are to talk about at that time they were very brilliant, as distinguished from otherby their systems, same that empires reached to form genuine.The Aztecs bequeathed us their taxation systems,were the last in arrivingValley of Mexico where they established the capital of Tenochtitlan (1325).Kingdom which dominated cultural and politically Mesoamerica Over the fourteenthcentury and first quarter of sixteenth They were located within the geographical areathat corresponds to southern half of the contemporary Mexico, where he developed agreat cultural activity since approximately 2000 BC. In this region lived in varioustowns, some of whom us are all left their thriving culture as in the case of thearchaeological remains the City of Teotihuacan, and uninhabited when the Spanisharrived.The Incas left us like their representation of mathematicalits operationsperforming. The foundation of the history of The Incas was based with de God ofCreation, TiciViracocha, who left the Rio Titicaca. People who lived nearby hadoffended the Grat god, so he destroyed the people and turned them into stone. Afterthis, Viracocha, created the Sun, Moon and new forms of human life to be distributed to different sites along the West coast of South America.They established a vast empire in The Andes in the fifteenth century.They were great conquerors, his empire stretched from northern Chile to southern Colombia, covering the current territory of Bolivia, Peru, and Ecuador to The Pacific.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.314
Threshold uncertainty score0.624

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicLatin American history and cultureFrench-language works237,207