MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991796308 · doi:10.18280/ria.330407

Compact Hardware of Running Gaussian Average Algorithm for Moving Object Detection Realized on FPGA and ASIC

2019· article· en· W2991796308 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Kaushal Kumar, Durgesh Nandan, Ritesh Kumar Mishra

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d intelligence artificielle · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayApplication-specific integrated circuitComputer scienceGaussianComputer hardwareFPGA prototypeEmbedded systemObject (grammar)Artificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time detection of moving object is essential to traffic monitoring, video surveillance and many other vital applications. The effectiveness of real-time detection hinges on background subtraction. This paper proposes a hardware-efficient architecture for the running Gaussian average (RGA) technique of background subtraction. The architecture was designed based on the field programmable gate array (FPGA) and application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). The FPGA was realized using Digilent ZedBoard, while the ASIC was implemented using Cadence Genus, Innovus, and Assura tools at 45 nm process technology. A prototype of our architecture was tested with a video containing multiple moving objects, and another containing a single moving object. The results show that the proposed architecture is efficient in terms of area, power and timing. Therefore, this paper provides a background subtraction approach that uses hardware resources effectively without sacrificing the detection accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d intelligence artificielleSame topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207