MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2991812787 · doi:10.1353/his.2019.0046

White Settler Reserve: New Iceland and the Colonization of the Canadian West by Ryan Eyford

2019· article· en· W2991812787 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Jane Errington

Bibliographic record

VenueHistoire sociale · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColonizationImmigrationIcelandicWhite (mutation)CitizenshipColonialismSettlement (finance)Quarter (Canadian coin)EthnologyIndigenousState (computer science)HistoryGender studiesGeographyPolitical scienceSociologyArchaeologyLawPoliticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: White Settler Reserve: New Iceland and the Colonization of the Canadian West by Ryan Eyford Jane Errington Eyford, Ryan – White Settler Reserve: New Iceland and the Colonization of the Canadian West. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2016. Pp. 272. On the face of it, one might think that White Settler Reserve: New Iceland and the Colonization of the Canadian West is a retelling of the traditional story of “the opening of the West” in the last quarter of the nineteenth century. In this deeply researched study, Ryan Eyford certainly recounts the arrival of Icelandic migrants to Manitoba and the difficulties they confronted adapting to their new environment. But as the title suggests, this ground breaking work is really a study of the federal government’s decision to establish colonization reserves for new immigrant groups, and how this attempt to create “a new liberal colonial order” (p. 9) worked on the ground. Today, we associate reserves with Indigenous spaces. In the latter part of the century, land reserves were also a vehicle to encourage group settlement of non-English-speaking European migrants who, it was believed, needed special tutelage “before they could be entrusted with liberal rights and freedoms” (pp. 10–11) and full citizenship. As Eyford persuasively argues, New Iceland, established on the shores of Lake Winnipeg, was an “experiment” in colonization that tells us a great deal not only about the immigrant experience, but also about current understandings of race and space, and the role of the state in systematically settling the West. The volume is organized both chronologically and topically. The introduction clearly and skilfully establishes the many theoretical strands that inform Eyford’s investigation: settler colonialism, Ian McKay’s liberal order framework, the role of cultural nationalism in shaping individual and state actions, and immigrant and indigenous history. Eyford then demonstrates how the two principal actors of this story shared a northern dream, but had differing assumptions about how that could be achieved. The Icelanders sought their own distinct community where they could maintain their language and culture, but they were also determined to become full participating subjects in their new home. For its part, the state sought to create a future Canada in which “‘the hardy northern races’ would predominate in the new [End Page 388] territories” (p. 44). Eyford then deftly explains the intention and inception of the colonial reserve system, established by the Mackenzie government as part of the Dominion Lands Act. The Icelanders were but one of a number of groups granted land collectively, on the understanding that eventually individual households would be able to secure title to their own private property. But “land reservation and group settlement generated tensions between individual and collective rights, integration and segregation, inclusion and exclusion” (p. 48). Within two years of their arrival, a number of settlers sought to gain title to their land and were increasingly frustrated by the federal government’s unwillingness and inability to address their concerns. Eyford devotes a chapter to exploring who these settlers actually were, why they chose to leave home, and their experiences “carving out a niche for themselves” (p. 95) in Canada. Like other nineteenth-century agricultural migrants, they were determined to “establish a future for the next generation” (p. 75), a dream that was jeopardized by the outbreak of smallpox a year after their arrival (see Chapter 4). It was months before local officials identified the outbreak “as a problem of public health and governance” (p. 109) and sent relief supplies and doctors to the community. The government also placed the entire region under quarantine. Eyford’s analysis of this tragic episode offers an in-depth look at the relations between the state and the settlers, between the settlers and their Indigenous neighbours, and the different impact that the epidemic had on residents of New Iceland and local Cree and Ojibwa communities. The quarantine “accentuated the distance of the Icelanders, both literally and symbolically, from the wider settler community” (p. 117), and the difficulty of receiving supplies led to increased poverty and a growing disillusionment with government policy. Moreover, the epidemic did little to ease relations with Indigenous neighbours. From the beginning, the Icelandic reserve was “a...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0100.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHistoire socialeSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207