A Bayesian hierarchical model of postlarval delta smelt entrainment: integrating transport, length composition, and sampling efficiency in estimates of loss
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hydrodynamic models have been used to estimate rates of ichthyoplankton transport across marine and estuarine environments and subsequent geographic isolation of a portion of the population (i.e., entrainment). Combining simulated data from hydrodynamic models with data from fish populations can provide more information, including estimates of regional abundance. Entrainment of postlarval delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus), a threatened species endemic to California’s Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, caused by water export operations, was modeled using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The model was fit using data spanning years 1995–2015 from multiple sources: hydrodynamic particle tracking, fish length composition, mark–recapture, and count data from entrainment monitoring. Estimates of the entrainment of postlarval delta smelt ranged from 10 (SD = 23) in May 2006 to 561 791 (SD = 246 423) in May 2002. A simulation study indicated that all model parameters were estimable, but errors in transport data led to biased estimates of entrainment. Using only single data sources rather than integration through hierarchical modeling would have underestimated uncertainty in entrainment estimates or resulted in bias if transport, survival, or sampling efficiency were unaccounted for.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".