MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2991934460 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.168

89 Evaluating the effect of Ca-gluconate and Ca-butyrate on SCFA absorption and permeability of the gastrointestinal tract

2019· article· en· W2991934460 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Hideki Mariano Watanabe, John Doelman, M.A. Steele, Leluo Guan, Greg B Penner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsButyrateRumenJejunumChemistryGastrointestinal tractAbomasumMannitolInternal medicineLarge intestineAnimal scienceIleumIntestinal permeabilityEndocrinologyOmasumBiochemistryFermentationBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The objective was to evaluate short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) absorption and permeability of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) of heifers infused either with Ca-gluconate or Ca-butyrate. Thirty-two ruminally cannulated beef heifers were fed a common diet (forage-to-concentrate ratio of 50:50) for 28 d and once daily infused with water (ruminal infusion; control), Ca-gluconate embedded in a fat matrix (ruminal infusion; 0.192% BW), unprotected Ca-gluconate (abomasal infusion; 0.077% of BW), and unprotected Ca-butyrate (abomasal infusion; 0.029% BW). Treatments were designed to provide the same amount of butyrate to the small intestine. DMI was restricted to 95% of voluntary DMI on d 8 and was recorded until heifers were slaughtered on d 28. Rumen, jejunum, and colon tissues were collected to determine the rate and pathway of SCFA transport, and for measurement of permeability.14C-acetate and 3H-butyrate absorption across the ruminal and colonic epithelium was measured with no inhibition and under maximal inhibition. Permeability was assessed for the rumen, jejunum and colon using mucosal-to-serosal flux of 14C-mannitol. Initial and final BW were not different (P > 0.60) averaging 388 ± 5.5 kg and 409 ± 6.6 kg, respectively. DMI was not affected by treatment averaging 7.7 kg/d (P = 0.77). Treatment did not affect the flux of acetate or butyrate across the ruminal or colonic epithelium (P > 0.33), but flux rates of SCFA were numerically greater across the ruminal epithelium. Moreover, approximately 50% of the ruminal acetate was transported via bicarbonate-dependent mechanisms. Mannitol flux was not affected by treatment (P > 0.29) and was numerically lower in the rumen and colon than in the jejunum, supporting previous research evaluating permeability across the GIT. According to this experiment, provision of Ca-butyrate or Ca-gluconate in an attempt to increase intestinal butyrate supply does not impact SCFA absorption or permeability of the rumen, jejunum, or colon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicRuminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology→French-language works237,207→