Beneficial Use into the Future - A Small Community Perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beneficial Use into the Future - A Small Community PerspectiveThe City of Washougal (City) is located in Clark County, Washington, approximately 18 miles east of Vancouver. The City is bordered by the Columbia River to the south, the City of Camas to the west, and the Columbia River Gorge Scenic Area to the east. The 2008 population of the City was approximately 13,480 with a projected growth rate of 4 percent from 2003 to 2012. Washougal's climate is...Author(s)Mark CullingtonTrevor EversSourceProceedings of the Water Environment FederationSubjectSession 7 - Pacific Northwest Regional IssuesDocument typeConference PaperPublisherWater Environment FederationPrint publication date Jan, 2009ISSN1938-6478SICI1938-6478(20090101)2009:3L.458;1-DOI10.2175/193864709793846619Volume / Issue2009 / 3Content sourceResiduals and Biosolids ConferenceFirst / last page(s)458 - 461Copyright2009Word count1,652Subject keywordsBiosolidsClass Alime pasteurizationcompostdryingpublic perceptiontriple bottom linemarketabilitysludge treatment technologiesbeneficial use
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".