CHIP: Channel-Wise Disentangled Interpretation of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the increasing popularity of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs), in addition to achieving high accuracy, it becomes increasingly important to explain how DCNNs make their decisions. In this article, we propose a CHannel-wise disentangled InterPretation (CHIP) model for visual interpretations of DCNN predictions. The proposed model distills the class-discriminative importance of channels in DCNN by utilizing sparse regularization. We first introduce network perturbation to learn the CHIP model. The proposed model is capable to not only distill the global perspective knowledge from networks but also present class-discriminative visual interpretations for the predictions of networks. It is noteworthy that the CHIP model is able to interpret different layers of networks without retraining. By combining the distilled interpretation knowledge at different layers, we further propose the Refined CHIP visual interpretation that is both high-resolution and class-discriminative. Based on qualitative and quantitative experiments on different data sets and networks, the proposed model provides promising visual interpretations for network predictions in an image classification task compared with the existing visual interpretation methods. The proposed model also outperforms the related approaches in the ILSVRC 2015 weakly supervised localization task.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it