MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992042375 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.583

PSI-9 Molecular characterization of Berganês sheep, a locally adapted ecotype from Brazilian semi-arid region

2019· article· en· W2992042375 on OpenAlexaff
Riani Ananda Nunes Soares, Joel Fonseca Nogueira, João Bandeira de Moura Neto, Gisele Veneroni Gouveia, Maria Norma Ribeiro, João José de Simoni Gouveia

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcotypeBiologySingle-nucleotide polymorphismPopulationHerdBreedLoss of heterozygosityVeterinary medicineGeneticsHardy–Weinberg principleGenotypeAnimal scienceAlleleGeneDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Ovis aries species is phenotypically diverse and it is bred around the world for meat, milk and wool production. In the 1980s, small farmers in the semi-arid region of Pernambuco, Brazil, initiated the introgression of genes from Santa Inês and Bergamácia breeds in their local sheep of undefined breed, and the selection of individuals in an unstructured form, giving rise to an ecotype with unique characteristics called Berganês. The aim of this study was to perform genetic structure analysis of the Berganês ecotype population on farms in the state of Pernambuco using the Illumina® BeadChip OvineSNP50 high density chip as a way of increasing knowledge about the ecotype. Animals from seven farms were genotyped, totaling 96 animals (17 males and 79 females). Of the 54,241 Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNPs) found, we elected the ones with GenCall Score > 0.5, Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (significance at 0.01) and lower allele frequency (MAF) > 0.2. In addition, only SNPs located on the autosomal chromosomes were maintained, according to version 4.0 of the sheep genome, with 39,250 SNPs being selected. The observed and expected mean heterozygosity values were, respectively, 0.37159 and 0.37943. The F statistics found were: FIS = 0.02622, FST = 0 and FIT = 0.02394. Most of the variability found (97.61%), which was estimated by AMOVA, is uniformly distributed within the herds and the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) did not allow the visual identification of a substructure considering herds, sex or phenotypic characteristics (coat color, ear size and insertion, and head morphology). Thus, the genetic variability presented in the animals of the Berganês ecotype is distributed homogeneously among the herds analyzed. Therefore, the genetic characterization presented here represents a key point in the creation of conservation plans and breeding programs, improving the efficiency of selection processes and the selection of breeders.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.338

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207