MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992048930

Itsik Fefer: A Yiddish Wunder Kind of the Bolshevik Revolution

2002· article· en· W2992048930 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gennady Estraikh

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianProletariatJudaismHistoryLiteraturePoetryNazismNationalismWorld War IIPoliticsClassicsPolitical scienceArt historyLawArtPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Itsik Fefer (1900-1952) was one of the most prominent Soviet Yiddish writers, who perfectly combined the two talents of a poet and an apparatchik. His 1922 poetry collection, Splinters, established him as a rising literary star. The same year he formulated his literary credo of simple speech, which would become the trademark of his work. By 1924, Fefer already occupied one of the highest places in the hierarchy of Soviet Yiddish literature. In 1927 he was one of the founding members of the Ukrainian Association of Yiddish Revolutionary Writers. He combined editorial positions at both Yiddish literary journals, Prolit (Proletarian Literature) and Di royte velt (Red World), published in Ukraine in the late 1920s and early 1930s. The creation of the Writers' Union increased Fefer's importance. He represented Yiddish literature on the board of the Soviet and Ukrainian's Writers' Unions. During WWII, Fefer became a leading figure in the Jewish Antifascist Committee. In 1943 he, together with Solomon Mikhoels, visited the United States, Canada, Mexico, and England. Fefer finished his life in prison, accused of Jewish nationalism and of spying for the Americans.VidervuksRevolutions treasure young people and despise the older generations. The oldtimers are considered to be suspicious and, therefore, have to vanish as soon as possible. In 1924 the young proletarian Yiddish poet Izi Kharik preached:Fargeyt, fargeyt, ir umetike zeydes,mit berd tseshrokene, farlofene mit shney!...In letstn brokh, in letstn veyzayt ir farblibn letste eydes, --fargeyt, fargeyt, ir umetike zeydes!(Pass on, pass on, you lonely grandfathers,With frightened beards covered with snow,In the last sorrow, in the final griefYou're still here, the final witnesses.Pass on, pass on, you lonely grandfathers!(2))David Bergelson, the founder of Yiddish literary impressionism, in his novel Mideshadin (Severe Judgement), tried to show that even the old guard of the Bolsheviks had to be replaced by young people.(3) The regime needed people like the protagonist of Perets Markish's story Khaveyrim kustarn (Comrades Artisans). This young Jewish communist, a demobilized Red Army soldier, is always ready to return to his squadron, and therefore he never, even in the heat of the summer, takes off his military greatcoat.(4)Among the Yiddish writers, too, young people were to occupy central positions. The poet Itsik Fefer was one of the most prominent among these Yiddish children of the revolution. Fefer was born in 1900 in the shtetl of Shpola, Kiev Region. His father was a teacher, his mother was a stocking-maker. He was only 17 when he became a member of the Bund and a trade-union functionary. On 4 June 1918 -- we know the date exactly(5) -- he wrote his first poem. 1919 was a stormy year in Fefer's life. He left the Bund and became a Communist; the White Guard police arrested him as a member of an underground group and incarcerated him in the infamous Lukianovka Prison in Kiev; after the liberation he volunteered for the Red Army. In the prison, his cellmate was Isaac Nusinov, later a significant Yiddish -- and even more Russian -- literary theorist and critic. After the Civil War, Fefer edited a provincial newspaper. In 1922, the Central Committee of the Ukrainian Communist Party transferred him to Kiev and placed him at the head of the artists' trade union.In Kiev, Fefer joined the local group of young Yiddish literary talents, called the Vidervuks (New Growth). This literary nursery emerged on the ruins of the organization Kultur-lige (Cultural League), which had created a network of Yiddish educational, publishing, and cultural institutions all over Ukraine as well as in some neighboring countries. The Kultur-lige had also yielded the first post-revolutionary harvest of Yiddish literary talents, such as David Hofshtein, Perets Markish, and Leib Kvitko, who -- together with a few more experienced writers, most notably David Bergelson, Der Nister, and Lipe Reznik -- became referred to as the Kiev group of Yiddish writers. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207