MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992119697 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.292

451 Late-Breaking: Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii stimulates immunoglobulin A production in the gut of neonate dairy calves

2019· article· en· W2992119697 on OpenAlexaff
Clothilde Villot, Le Luo Guan, A.L. Skidmore, Eric Chevaux, M.A. Steele

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIleumJejunumColostrumAnimal scienceBiologyAntibodySaccharomyces boulardiiImmune systemInternal medicineImmunoglobulin AEndocrinologyImmunologyImmunoglobulin GMedicineProbiotic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Calves are born with a naïve immune system at birth and undergo rapid changes in terms of immunity. This study focused on evaluating the effect of S. boulardii CNCMI-1079 (SCB) supplementation from birth on immunoglobulin A (IgA) production in the gut of neonate dairy calves. Holstein bull calves (n = 20) were delivered naturally and immediately removed from the dam, and housed in individual straw-bedded pens with a random assignment to a treated group (supplementation with SCB: 10 × 109 CFU/d in each morning meal) or a control group (no supplementation). All the calves received two first meals of a standardized colostrum at 2 h and 12 h after birth followed by two meals per day of milk replacer (7.5% of birth BW; 260 g/kg CP; 160 g/kg crude fat, at 150g/L). Calves were euthanized at 7 d of age and samples from jejunum, ileum and colon were collected. The concentration of IgA and the gene expressions of polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR) and a receptor of plasma B cells (CD79α) were compared between the two groups and among the locations. The expression of CD79α was up-regulated in the ileum compared to jejunum and colon tissues (P < 0.01), whereas pIgR down-regulated in the ileum compared to jejunum and colon (P < 0.01). The supplementation of SCB increased the IgA concentration in the ileum and colon of treated calves compared to the control calves (respectively 1.98 ± 0.09 vs 1.18 ± 0.15 mg/g DM of ileum content, and 1.45 ± 0.14 vs 0.59 ± 0.06 mg/g DM of colon content, P < 0.001). The results suggest that one of the mechanisms by which SCB exerts an immunoprotective effect in the gut is by stimulation of IgA’s secretion which may play a major role in mucosal protection in neonatal calves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal health and immunologyFrench-language works237,207