MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992130559

THE LONG RUN RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: CASE OF JORDAN

2003· article· en· W2992130559 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bassam M. AbuAl-Foul, Osamah Al‐Khazali

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of economics and economic education research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)EconomicsGranger causalityGovernment revenueGovernment spendingCausality (physics)MacroeconomicsDevelopment economicsClassical economicsEconomyPublic financeEconometricsMarket economy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Using data from the Jordanian economy, the paper conducts a causality test of the which states that there is a relationship between the growth in government expenditures and the economic growth. The findings of the study show that the growth in the economy Granger causes the growth in the government sector. Thus, the applies to the case of Jordan. Using co-integration technique and the VAR model, the study suggests that there is a uni-directional relationship between the economic growth and the growth in the government expenditures. INTRODUCTION The size of the government expenditures in Jordan has increased since 1969. With respect to the government services, its contribution to the GDP in the years 1969, 1980, and 1990 was 27.2 percent, 28.5 percent, and 30.9 percent, respectively (Penn Tables). The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between the government size and the economic development in the case of Jordan. This goal will be achieved using the methodology suggested by Wagner (1893), and Islam and Nazemzadeh (2001). This analysis will be in the framework of Wagner's Law that suggested that there is correlation between the relative size of government sector and the economic development in the country. That is, there is a tendency for the government sector to grow as the national income grows. So this paper will test empirically whether or not a causal relationship exists between the size of the government sector and the growth of the economy. Review of the literature shows mixed support of Wagner's Law which suggests that there is a relationship between the relative size of the government and the economic growth. Conte and Darrat (1988) conducted an empirical study on the OECD countries for the period 1960-1984 to test whether there is Granger causality relationship between the growth in the public sector and economic growth in these countries. Their findings showed that the growth in the government sector had mixed impact on the rate of economic growth, and that in most of the OECD countries had no clear effect on the growth rate in their real income. Other study on the Canadian economy for the period 1947-1986, Afxentious and Serletis (1991) have empirically tested the Granger-Sims causality relationship between government expenditure and gross domestic product. Their findings indicated that neither hypothesis, which runs from GDP to government spending, nor the reverse causality, which runs from the government spending to GDP, is statistically supported. In addition, Yousefi and Abizadeh (1992) tested using data over the period 1950-1985 for each of the randomly selected 30 states of the U.S. economy. The empirical findings of their study indicated that is valid for 70 percent of the cases considered in the study, i.e., in 21 out of the 30 states selected randomly. In another study, Abizadeh and Yousefi (1998) have empirically tested the on the South Korean economy and they concluded that government expenditures have not contributed to economic growth in the case of South Korea. An empirical study on the U.S. economy by Islam and Nazemzadeh (2001) shows that a long run relationship exists between the relative size of the government and the economic development. It also shows that there is a uni-directional causal relationship between the relative size of the government and the economic development and that relationship goes from economic development to the relative size of the government. The paper will be organized as follows. Section 2 presents the data used in the study. Methodology will be discussed in section 3, while the empirical results will be discussed in section 4. Finally, summary and conclusion will be presented in section 5. DATA Data used in the study were extracted from various sources. These include the Central Bank of Jordan, Jordan Department of Statistics, and the international financial statistics. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.141
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of economics and economic education researchSame topicFiscal Policy and Economic GrowthFrench-language works237,207