MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992188841

Nanocomposites of carbon nanosphere and graphene oxide with iron oxide as high-performance adsorbents for arsenic removal

2018· dissertation· en· W2992188841 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hui Su

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2018
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGoldcorp
KeywordsGrapheneNanocompositeOxideIron oxideAdsorptionArsenicMaterials scienceCarbon fibersChemical engineeringNanotechnologyChemistryComposite materialMetallurgyComposite numberOrganic chemistryEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arsenic is a widely distributed element in the Earth’s crust with an average \nterrestrial concentration of about 5 g ton-1 \n. Arsenic is a persistent, bio-accumulative, toxic \nelement. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented the \ndischarge criterion of 10 µg L \n-1 \nfor arsenic as the maximum acceptable level for ground \nwater. During the past decades, several techniques have been developed for the removal \nof arsenic from the wastewater, including chemical precipitation, adsorption and ion \nexchange, membrane and biological removal processes, and so on. Because of the good \narsenic removal efficiency and the low cost, adsorption is a more popular method. In this \nthesis research, two ranges of iron oxide nanocomposite adsorbents have been developed \nand studied for their performance properties towards arsenic removal. \nNovel iron oxide encapsulated carbon nanospheres (FeOx-CNS) with excellent \narsenic adsorption performance has been successfully synthesized. CO2 activated carbon \nnanospheres material (A-CNS) with high surface area (2271 m²g \n-1 \n) and high pore volume \n(5.18 cm³g \n-1 \n) was selected as the porous matrix. After surface oxidation by ammonium \npersulfate (APS), iron oxide was loaded into the carbon nanospheres as the effective \narsenic adsorbent. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Braunauer–Emmett– \nTeller (BET) results indicate that iron oxide nanoparticles (7-60 wt%) are well-dispersed \nwithin the mesopores. In particular, FeOx-CNS-13 composite shows most optimum performance properties, with high arsenic adsorption capacities achieved for both As(III) \n(416 mg g−1 \n) and As(V) (201 mg g−1 \n). \nAnother range of amorphous iron oxide-graphene oxide (FeOx-GO) \nnanocomposites having different graphene oxide (GO) content (36-80 wt%) was prepared \nby coprecipitation of ferrous sulfate heptahydrate and ferric sulfate hydrate on GO sheets. \nThe composites have been thoroughly characterized and investigated for their \nperformance towards arsenic removal. The optimum composite, FeOx-GO-80 having the \nhighest iron oxide content of 80 wt% shows excellent arsenic adsorption capacities for \nboth As(III) (147 mg g−1 \n) and As(V) (113 mg g−1 \n), which are highest among iron oxideGO \ncomposites reported to date for arsenic removal. The high performance along with \nlow cost and convenience in synthesis makes this range of amorphous iron oxide-GO \nnanocomposites promising for applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207