MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992225407 · doi:10.1063/1.5126723

A minimax approach to one-shot entropy inequalities

2019· article· en· W2992225407 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
FundersMinistry of Education - SingaporeNational Research Foundation Singapore
KeywordsMathematical proofMinimaxInformation theoryEntropy (arrow of time)QuantumSimple (philosophy)Quantum relative entropySmoothing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-shot information theory entertains a plethora of entropic quantities, such as the smooth max-divergence, hypothesis testing divergence, and information spectrum divergence, that characterize various operational tasks in quantum information theory and are used to analyze their asymptotic behavior. Tight inequalities between these quantities are thus of immediate interest. In this note, we use a minimax approach (appearing previously, for example, in the proofs of the quantum substate theorem), to simplify the quantum problem to a commutative one, which allows us to derive such inequalities. Our derivations are conceptually different from previous arguments and in some cases lead to tighter relations. We hope that the approach discussed here can lead to progress in open problems in quantum Shannon theory and exemplify this by applying it to a simple case of the joint smoothing problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.501
Threshold uncertainty score0.411

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it