MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992230041 · doi:10.1088/1751-8121/abda77

Travelling wave solutions on a non-zero background for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation

2021· article· en· W2992230041 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen C. Anco, HamidReza Nayeri, Elena Recio

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZero (linguistics)PhysicsKorteweg–de Vries equationInteger (computer science)Mathematical physicsIntegrable systemMathematical analysisKinematic waveBoundary (topology)KinematicsMathematicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanicsNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For the generalized p -power Korteweg–de Vries equation, all non-periodic travelling wave solutions with non-zero boundary conditions are explicitly classified for all integer powers p ⩾ 1. These solutions are shown to consist of: bright solitary waves and static humps on a non-zero background for odd p ; dark solitary waves on a non-zero background and kink (shock) waves for even p in the defocusing case; pairs of bright/dark solitary waves on a non-zero background, and also bright and dark heavy-tail waves (with power decay) on a non-zero background, for even p in the focussing case. An explicit physical parameterization is given for each type of solution in terms of the wave speed c , background size b , and wave height/depth h . The allowed kinematic region for existence of the solutions is derived, and other main kinematic features are discussed. Analytical formulas are presented in the higher power cases p = 3, 4, which are compared to the integrable cases p = 1, 2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207