Fundamental study of vibrotactile perception threshold on japanese - Effectiveness of new equipment to diagnose workers exposed to hand-transmitted vibration
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effectiveness of the new vibrotactile perception threshold (VPT) measurement equipment was evaluated by collecting data from Japanese workers having exposure to hand-arm vibration, comparing VPTs of HAVS free workers with those of contained in ISO 13091-2:2003, and comparing VPTs between persons with and without HAVS for Japanese workers. The study subjects comprised twenty-seven Japanese male workers who were exposed to hand-transmitted vibration. Seventeen workers were engaged in road maintenance as public servants (Group 1), and the rest (ten workers) were engaged in forestry work (Group 2). Four (24%) workers in Group 1 and nine (90%) in Group 2 reported they had some dysesthesia in fingers and these dysthesia were regarded as being related to vibration exposure. The results also show that the mean VPT values for the subjects are statistically significantly higher than ISO references on all fingers at 4Hz.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".