LC-MS analysis data of intermediate products used to construct photodegradation pathways for bis(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)amine (H2BTA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The photolysis of bis(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)amine (H2BTA) in water was carried out in SolSim and Rayonet photochemical reactors equipped with solar simulating and ultraviolet lamps, respectively. The intermediary degradation products were monitored and tentatively identified by liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry (LC–MS). A quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF) was used to measure the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of the deprotonated molecular ions ([M – H]−) using electrospray ionization in negative mode (ESI-), thus making it possible to determine the number of C, H, N and O in the molecules. Four major degradation products, namely N-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)formamide (T(5yl)FA), 1H-tetrazol-5-ylcarbamic acid (T(5yl)CA), N-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)carbamohydrazonic acid (T(5yl)CHA) and 1H-tetrazol-5-amine (5-AT), have been identified after solar simulated and UV irradiation. This dataset is supplementary to the research paper “Photodegradation of bis(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)amine (H2BTA), a high nitrogen content tetrazole-based energetic compound in water” [1].
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".