MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992318269 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v14i2.1929

Fostering Mezirow's Transformative Learning Theory in the Adult Education Classroom: A Critical Review

2000· review· en· W2992318269 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformative learningAdult educationAdult LearningPedagogySociologyPsychologyCritical theoryEpistemologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This critical review builds upon the theoretical and practical debate of Mezirow's transformative learning theory by investigating what 23 empirical studies reveal about the practice of fostering transformative learning in the classroom. The review finds much support for Mezirow's ideals for promoting rational discourse and critical reflection. Findings point to the importance of fostering group ownership and individual agency, providing intense shared experiential activities, capitalizing on the interrelationship of critical reflection and affective learning, developing an awareness of personal and social contextual influences, promoting value-laden course content, and the need for time—all of which reveal a complex and challenging form of teaching. Future research needs to focus on the more subjective elements of fostering transformative learning, such as the role of relationships, how emotions are managed in the classroom to promote critical reflection, and the impact of fostering transformative learning on learning outcomes. Résumé Prenant appui sur 23 études empiriques, cet examen critique des écrits s'intéresse aux aspects tant théoriques que pratiques du débat qui concerne la théorie de l'apprentissage transformatif «transformative learning» de Mezirow. Cette recension vient appuyer l'idéal de Mezirow en matière de discours rationnel et de réflexion critique. En effet, les résultats indiquent qu'il est important de mettre l'accent sur l'appartenance au groupe et sur l'initiative individuelle, de favoriser la mise en commun d'activités axées sur l'expérience, de prendre en compte les interrelations entre la pensée critique et les aspects plus affectifs de l'apprentissage, de développer une conscience des influences personnelles et de celles liées au contexts, de promouvoir des contenus de cours faisant la promotion de certaines valeurs et d'accorder le temps nécessaire à la réflexion. Ce qui précède constitue un défi invitant â penser l'enseignement d'une manière nouvelle et complexe. Les futures recherches auront à se pencher sur les éléments plus subjectifs associés au développement de l'apprentissage transformatif tels que le rôle des relations, la manière de prendre en compte les émotions dans le développement de la réflexion critique et l'impact de l'encouragement de l'apprentissage transformatif sur les resultats de l'apprentissage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.889
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it