Fostering Mezirow's Transformative Learning Theory in the Adult Education Classroom: A Critical Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This critical review builds upon the theoretical and practical debate of Mezirow's transformative learning theory by investigating what 23 empirical studies reveal about the practice of fostering transformative learning in the classroom. The review finds much support for Mezirow's ideals for promoting rational discourse and critical reflection. Findings point to the importance of fostering group ownership and individual agency, providing intense shared experiential activities, capitalizing on the interrelationship of critical reflection and affective learning, developing an awareness of personal and social contextual influences, promoting value-laden course content, and the need for time—all of which reveal a complex and challenging form of teaching. Future research needs to focus on the more subjective elements of fostering transformative learning, such as the role of relationships, how emotions are managed in the classroom to promote critical reflection, and the impact of fostering transformative learning on learning outcomes. Résumé Prenant appui sur 23 études empiriques, cet examen critique des écrits s'intéresse aux aspects tant théoriques que pratiques du débat qui concerne la théorie de l'apprentissage transformatif «transformative learning» de Mezirow. Cette recension vient appuyer l'idéal de Mezirow en matière de discours rationnel et de réflexion critique. En effet, les résultats indiquent qu'il est important de mettre l'accent sur l'appartenance au groupe et sur l'initiative individuelle, de favoriser la mise en commun d'activités axées sur l'expérience, de prendre en compte les interrelations entre la pensée critique et les aspects plus affectifs de l'apprentissage, de développer une conscience des influences personnelles et de celles liées au contexts, de promouvoir des contenus de cours faisant la promotion de certaines valeurs et d'accorder le temps nécessaire à la réflexion. Ce qui précède constitue un défi invitant â penser l'enseignement d'une manière nouvelle et complexe. Les futures recherches auront à se pencher sur les éléments plus subjectifs associés au développement de l'apprentissage transformatif tels que le rôle des relations, la manière de prendre en compte les émotions dans le développement de la réflexion critique et l'impact de l'encouragement de l'apprentissage transformatif sur les resultats de l'apprentissage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".