MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992337865 · doi:10.1063/1.5131022

Flattening van der Waals heterostructure interfaces by local thermal treatment

2019· article· en· W2992337865 on OpenAlexafffund
Justin Boddison-Chouinard, Samantha Scarfe, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Adina Luican‐Mayer

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Physics Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
Topic2D Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCore Research for Evolutional Science and TechnologyNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHeterojunctionMaterials scienceFlatteningFabricationvan der Waals forceOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyLayer (electronics)Raster scanThermalOpticsComposite materialChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fabrication of custom-built heterostructures based on stacked 2D materials provides an effective method to controllably tune electronic and optical properties. To that end, optimizing fabrication techniques for building these heterostructures is imperative. A common challenge in layer-by-layer assembly of 2D materials is the formation of bubbles at atomically thin interfaces. We propose a technique for addressing this issue by removing the bubbles formed at the heterostructure interface in a custom-defined area using the heat generated by a laser equipped with raster scanning capabilities. We demonstrate that the density of bubbles formed at graphene-ReS2 interfaces can be controllably reduced using this method. We discuss an understanding of the flattening mechanism by considering the interplay of interface thermal conductivities and adhesion energies between two atomically thin 2D materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Physics LettersSame topic2D Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207