Study on the Relationship between the Origin of Broken Plates in Northern Canada and Continental Drift
Bibliographic record
Abstract
加拿大北部的“破碎山河”是地球上独一无二的，它们是如何形成的？目前关于其成因的模式一直是沿用传统的海底扩张和板块构造的模式解释的，但这种模式在其他地区存在自相矛盾的地方。本文结合作者提出的大陆漂移的源动力——板块自驱动模式，给出了一个北美洲受力模型，说明了加拿大北部破碎山河的成因。该成因模型为我们重新认识北美洲地理环境成因提供了一个新的思路。Broken plates in northern Canada are unique on Earth, how they are formed? The current explana-tion about it is that it was formed by seafloor spreading and plate tectonics model, but this model cannot be explained in many cases and even has contradictory. Combined with the model “source power for continental drifting-plate self-driven mode” by the author, a new genetic model was given in this paper, that is the North America-force model which explains the causes of broken plates in northern Canada. The genetic model pro-vides us a new way to rethink the origin model of the North America geographical environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".