Bibliographic record
Abstract
tus as novel or novella or autobiography.The themes of silence and solitude appear again, as does the new theme of love.Grimaldi Morosoff shows how Aleramo becomes increasingly preoccupied with describing the potential of love because life- power manifests itself through love.It is especially in this novel that Aleramo is able to transcend the past events of her life, rendering them artistically, and reinterpret- ing her experiences in their universality.From II passaggio emerges the 'new-womanpoet" (p.6l) whose intention is to change the myth of woman that man has created.Yet this myth is curiously re appropriated in Amo.dunque sono, a series of never read letters written to her lover while he, at a faraway retreat, prepares his body and soul for more spiritual endeavours, denying her any contact or communication and demanding fidelir\-to their unconsummated relationship.Grimaldi Morosoff sees in this also a transfiguration: "Sibilla, who is not a saint, but a poet, strives to change what causes her the greatest suffering....She recognizes herself incomplete... Woman was not created for man; they were created for each other.' (p.78-79).But while man considers himself from Cartesian rationalism (I think, therefore I am), woman must be completed by love (amo, dunque sono).Grimaldi Morosoff calls this attitude sub- versive and iconoclastic, explicating how it has added to the myth of the angelic woman and demonic woman and pointing out how, through language that may be both highly lyrical and metaphorical or more plain and concrete, Aleramo seeks to dismantle that myth.But the example of Sibilla's head does not convince, although the point itself is of fimdamental importance in Aleramo's works.Finally, there is a perspicacious and well researched examination of Aleramo's only third-person narrative, II frustino.The study of Aleramo in her transfiguration to woman-lover-artist is thought provoking particularly in its presentation of the metaphor of paper roses; of greater critical value is the evidence of how this novel presents Aleramo in her stance as a new Prometheus.Transfigurations by Grimaldi Morosoff curiously does not acknowledge the important contributions of Lucienne Kroha (1992) to Aleramo studies.Nevertheless, like the latter, this too is a most wel- come addition not onlyfor Aleramo scholars but to all those who are re-evaluating the works of women writers of eariv 20th centur\-Italy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".