Le insidie dell'allegoria: Ermolao Barbaro il Vecchio e la lezione degli antichi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is a study of the two Orationes contra Poetas which the Venetian patrician and bishop ofVerona, Ermolao Barbaro the Elder (1410-71) published in 1455 or the years immediately thereafter in reaction to a letter of the Franciscan friar Bartolomeo of Lendinara.Sometimes viewed as an obscurantist attack on poetry and pagan literature, Barbaro s orations are in fact, from my own reading of them, a far more clear headed recitation of the facts of matter, than the illusions expressed by fra Bartolomeo.A pupil of Guarino Veronese and translator from the Greek of some of Aesop's fables, Barbaro was well versed in classical literature, a friend of humanists, and the supporter of a humanist circle at Verona.Giorgio Ronconi, the editor of Barbaro's Orationes m 1972, did an excellent job in laying out Barbaro's human- ists interests and connections.In her opening chapter, Esposito Frank builds on Ronconi's data before going on in the subsequent chapter to summarize the
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".