Processus de changement des adolescents auteurs de violences sexuelles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article présente les principales avancées issues d’une recherche menée conjointement sur deux sites cliniques, en Suisse et en France, et consacrée à l’évaluation des processus de changement des adolescents auteurs de violences sexuelles. L’objectif est de dégager les principaux indicateurs cliniques de ces changements, à partir d’une étude longitudinale portant sur un petit nombre d’adolescents (N =9), engagés dans une démarche psychothérapeutique sous mandat judiciaire en groupe. L’étude s’appuie sur une démarche qualitative, qui associe principalement deux types de recueil de données cliniques : épreuves projectives en test-retest d’une part et enregistrement des verbatims de séances de groupe d’autre part. À partir de l’analyse croisée de ces données, un certain nombre d’indicateurs cliniques peuvent être mis en évidence, qui permettent d’esquisser une modélisation des processus de changement chez les adolescents. Au-delà, les éléments de compréhension qui émergent de la recherche permettent de tracer des perspectives pour le soin psychothérapeutique des adolescents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".