MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992426651 · doi:10.4000/estampe.1221

La gravure à Bologne

2011· article· fr· W2992426651 on OpenAlexaff
Bernard Huchet

Bibliographic record

VenueNouvelles de l estampe · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanitiesArt history

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

C'est à Rome, au poids du papier, lorsqu'on dispersait en 1845 les objets d'art du cardinal Fesch, que Bernard Mancel put acquérir sa colossale collection d'estampes, estimée à plus de 50 000 pièces.L'exploration de ce fonds tentaculaire, légué à la Ville de Caen en 1872, se poursuit depuis lors et permet aux conservateurs du musée des Beaux-Arts, à la faveur de regroupements significatifs, d'utiles coups de projecteur sur l'œuvre de graveurs peu ou mal connus, en parallèle des opérations matérielles de conservation que réclament certaines pièces.Cette fois, c'est une série d'estampes qu'apparente une commune origine bolognaise, mais entre lesquelles se dessinent aussi quelques filiations esthétiques, du XVI e à la fin du XVII e siècle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNouvelles de l estampeSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207