Huqoq – 2014: Preliminary Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
mag_id=124&previewit=TrUe)) where there are three main occupation phases, which will be described chronologically: the Late Roman period (fifth century CE), when the synagogue was erected and in use; the Middle Ages (twelfth-fifteenth centuries CE), when the Late Roman synagogue was reused as a public building; and the Late Ottoman -Modern Period (nineteenth-twentieth centuries CE, up to 1948), at which time the area was covered with domestic structures belonging to the village of Yaquq. The Late Roman PeriodThe Late Roman level in the synagogue (Fig. 1) was reached in a square containing a small section of the west aisle and part of the nave; in three squares along a north-south axis in the nave; and in places where balks were dismantled in the east aisle.The removal of the balks, which surrounded mosaics that were exposed in previous seasons, revealed more of the foundations of the synagogue's south wall and the large paving stones in its courtyard.Additional mosaics in the east aisle, in a small part of the west aisle and in part of the nave were also exposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".