MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992731787

Geochemical Classification, Petrogenetic Association of Magmatic Rocks in the Gboko Area and the Tectono-Magmatic Influence on the Evolution of the (Gboko Area) Lower Benue Trough of Nigeria

2014· article· en· W2992731787 on OpenAlexfundno aff
T Najime

Bibliographic record

VenueJournals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsGeologyMagmatismGeochemistryBasaltNephelineNepheline syenitePetrogenesisPeralkaline rockTrough (economics)CrustTectonicsVolcanic rockPetrologyVolcanoPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magmatism in the Gboko area is found to be genetically related to the evolution of the lower sectorial part of the intracratonic sedimentary Benue Trough of Nigeria.Geochemical interpretations of major and trace data show that the rocks which are mainly volcanics with some hypabyssal and plutonic varieties are mainly basaltic (basalts, basaltic trachyandesites, trachydacites), phonolitic (phonolite, tepri-phonolites,), rhyolites and nepheline syenites are generally of calc-alkaline series.They are peraluminous to metaluminous with a few peralkaline.Major and trace elements tectonic discrimination plots reveal that the basaltic rocks are characteristic of Within Plate Basalts (WPB), Oceanic Arc Theoliites (OIT), and Ocean Island Alkalic (OIA) while the nepheline syenites are characteristic of Within Plate Granites (WPG).The plots also show that the tectonic setting is continental in a spreading centre and related to orogenesis.The evolved rocks in the Gboko area of the Lower Benue Trough are products of interaction between magmatism and tectonism which resulted from progressive crustal thining related to a spreading centre that regulated contamination from the crust and/or asthenosphere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.479

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)Same topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207