MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2992734264 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz258.551

PSVIII-19 Meta-analysis of genetic parameter estimates for feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle

2019· article· en· W2992734264 on OpenAlexaff
Hinayah Rojas de Oliveira, Flávio S. Schenkel, Caeli Richardson, F. Miglior, Luiz F. Brito

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidual feed intakeHeritabilitySelection (genetic algorithm)BiologyDairy cattleAnimal scienceBiotechnologyFeed conversion ratioStatisticsGenetic gainDry matterProfitability indexMeta-analysisMathematicsGenetic variationBody weightComputer scienceEconomicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Over 60% of the production costs in dairy cattle are related to feeding. Genetic selection for improved feed efficiency (FE) is a very promising alternative to reduce feeding costs, increase the industry profitability, and reduce the industry environmental footprints. The success of genetic selection relies in part on the heritability (h2) of the indicator traits included in the breeding programs. Several studies have reported h2 estimates for different FE indicator traits, with a broad range of estimates. To obtain more consistent h2 estimates across studies and populations, we performed a meta-analysis of published h2 estimates using four different groups of FE indicator traits commonly used in dairy cattle: 1) energy intake (EI); 2) residual feed intake (RFI); 3) feed (dry-matter) intake (FI); and 4) feed conversion efficiency (FCE). A comprehensive literature review identified 148 h2 estimates across 39 scientific papers from 13 different countries, published between 1991 and 2019. Thereafter, a meta-analysis based on random-effects model was used to summarize and address the variability of the parameter estimates. Our study confirmed that FE indicator traits in dairy cattle are under moderate genetic control. The h2 estimates were 0.18±0.02, 0.19±0.02, 0.29±0.01, and 0.19±0.03 for EI, RFI, FI, and FCE, respectively. In addition, our findings showed that h2 estimates for FE indicator traits in different studies have significant heterogeneity (I2 index estimated for EI, RFI, FI and FCE was 80.5%, 59.8%, 81.7%, and 55.7%, respectively). Among the possible sources of variation that contributed to the heterogeneity across studies are country, type of housing, life stage, and diet. The results reported here summarize the overall level of genetic control of FE in dairy cattle, which are useful for genetic evaluations when reliable h2 estimates for FE are not available in the studied dairy cattle population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.023
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.044
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0230.044
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0110.046
Bibliometrics0.0080.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal Science→Same topicGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestock→French-language works237,207→