MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992765117

Prezi: Trading Linear Presentations for Conceptual Learning Experiences

2011· article· en· W2992765117 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amanda J. Rockinson‐Szapkiw, Justin M. Tucker, Anita Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Commons (Liberty University) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicEducational Games and Gamification
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Undergraduate EducationUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the influx of technology into pedagogical practice steadily increases, educators routinely find themselves searching for effective technologies that will enhance their abilities to teach within higher cognitive domains, thus directing learners towards the construction of knowledge. Prezi is a web based presentation application that allows users to move away from this linear model and design a concept map style presentation on an infinite flash-based canvas. The Prezi presentation format effectively pushes learners to develop knowledge via analysis, evaluation, and creation. This poster session will demonstrate how to build a Prezi presentation based on cognitive theories to ensure it is not just a fancy PowerPoint presentation. Specifically, it will demonstrate how Prezi

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.617
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital Commons (Liberty University)Same topicEducational Games and GamificationFrench-language works237,207