Educación inclusiva en las escuelas canadienses. Una mirada desde la perspectiva española 1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente articulo recoge las conclusiones de un estudio realizado por el autor sobre experiencias educativas de caracter inclusivo desarrolladas en escuelas canadienses del area de Toronto. Ademas de la visita a escuelas y aulas donde los ninos con discapacidad compartian su trabajo con sus companeros en un entorno normalizado, las entrevistas con profesores, directores, auxiliares, estudiantes y padres han completado una vision amplia de las posibilidades y dificultades del enfoque inclusivo en el contexto canadiense. La experiencia inclusiva se presenta en confrontacion con la situacion de la integracion escolar en Espana, donde parece que no se produce un cambio que lleve a las escuelas a la puesta en marcha de una educacion inclusiva. El articulo trata de analizar que elementos se encuentran en la practica educativa de las escuelas inclusivas que pudieran servir de reflexion a quienes gestionan y desarrollan la educacion en Espana sobre la necesidad de introducir determinados cambios que promuevan la transicion de una escuela integradora a una escuela inclusiva.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".