MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2992840148

Government Responses to the Indian Residential Schools Settlement in Canada: Implications for Australia

2008· article· en· W2992840148 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bradford W. Morse

Bibliographic record

VenueAustralian indigenous law review · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)Project commissioningPublishingGovernment (linguistics)Economic JusticeCompensation (psychology)Political scienceMomentum (technical analysis)CriminologyPublic administrationLawSociologyBusinessPsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper seeks to highlight the key nature of the Indian residential schools in Canada and their tragic, ongoing impact upon survivors as well as their intergenerational effects. The paper summarises the efforts to bring school officials who committed acts of sexual and other forms of physical abuse to the attention of the criminal justice system as well as moves to obtain compensation through civil litigation. It then provides a backdrop for the momentum to achieve a global settlement for all survivors, as well as detailing the contents of the resulting settlement and the current efforts to achieve reconciliation between Aboriginal peoples and the rest of Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.761
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAustralian indigenous law reviewSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207