Reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex during continuous administration of anaesthetic agents: a double‐blind randomised crossover study using the bispectral index
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Sugammadex, a specific reversal agent for steroidal neuromuscular blocking drugs, has on occasion been reported to be associated with clinical signs of awakening. We performed a study to systematically search for an increase in bispectral index values and signs of awakening in patients maintained under general anaesthesia following sugammadex administration. Patients, scheduled to receive general anaesthesia with neuromuscular blockade, were included in this double‐blind randomised crossover study. After surgery was completed, and while the train‐of‐four ratio was zero, intravenous anaesthesia was continued with the aim of maintaining the bispectral index in the range of 40–60. Patients then received either sugammadex 4 mg.kg −1 or saline. In cases of incomplete reversal of neuromuscular blockade after 5 min, patients received the other drug. Bispectral index and train‐of‐four monitoring were recorded every minute and clinical signs of awakening noted. Fifty‐one patients completed the study. Median ( IQR [range]) bispectral index values increased after sugammadex administration from 49 (43–53 [38–64]) to 63 (53–80 [45–97]) (p < 0.01) with an increase of ≥ 20 in 22 patients; 14 (27%) patients had clinical signs of awakening. Saline had no effect on bispectral index values, clinical signs of awakening or degree of neuromuscular blockade. This study confirms that reversal of neuromuscular blockade with sugammadex may be associated with clinical signs of awakening despite maintenance of anaesthesia. Intravenous anaesthesia should be maintained until complete recovery of muscle function is achieved, especially when sugammadex is administered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".