Barcoding and demultiplexing Oxford Nanopore native RNA sequencing reads with deep residual learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Nanopore sequencing has enabled sequencing of native RNA molecules without conversion to cDNA, thus opening the gates to a new era for the unbiased study of RNA biology. However, a formal barcoding protocol for direct sequencing of native RNA molecules is currently lacking, limiting the efficient processing of multiple samples in the same flowcell. A major limitation for the development of barcoding protocols for direct RNA sequencing is the error rate introduced during the base-calling process, especially towards the 5’ and 3’ ends of reads, which complicates sequence-based barcode demultiplexing. Here, we propose a novel strategy to barcode and demultiplex direct RNA sequencing nanopore data, which does not rely on base-calling or additional library preparation steps. Specifically, custom DNA oligonucleotides are ligated to RNA transcripts during library preparation. Then, raw current signal corresponding to the DNA barcode is extracted and transformed into an array of pixels, which is used to determine the underlying barcode using a deep convolutional neural network classifier. Our method, DeePlexiCon , implements a 20-layer residual neural network model that can demultiplex 93% of the reads with 95.1% specificity, or 60% of reads with 99.9% specificity. The availability of an efficient and simple barcoding strategy for native RNA sequencing will enhance the use of direct RNA sequencing by making it more cost-effective to the entire community. Moreover, it will facilitate the applicability of direct RNA sequencing to samples where the RNA amounts are limited, such as patient-derived samples.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".