MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Long-Term Outcomes of Post-Surgical Deep-Vein Thrombosis in Asia: The AIDA-Extension Study.

2005· article· en· W2992983202 on OpenAlexaff
Franco Piovella, Ching‐Jen Wang, Lai Heng Lee, Won Chul Lee, Alexander G.G. Turpie, Alexander Gallus, André Planès, R. Passera

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDeep veinIncidence (geometry)Pulmonary embolismThrombosisPost-thrombotic syndromeOrthopedic surgeryCumulative incidenceSurgeryComplicationConfidence intervalInternal medicineTransplantation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: We have recently demonstrated in a large multinational, multiethnic study that the incidence of venographic deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) in Asian patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery of the lower limbs and not receiving thromboprophylaxis was similar to that observed in orthopedic patients in Western countries. Overall, 407 patients (20–99 years) undergoing THR (n=175), TKR (n=136) or HFS (n= 96) were recruited in 19 centres across Asia (Indonesia, South Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Taiwan and Thailand). 72.5% of the enrolled patients had adequate venograms. Total DVT was diagnosed in 121 of 295 evaluable patients (41.0%, [95% confidence interval: 35.4–46.7]). Proximal DVT was found in 30 patients (10.2% [7.0–14.2]). However the long-term outcomes following deep vein thrombosis such as recurrence of DVT, incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) remain unknown. PTS has received little attention in the literature, and particularly in Asia. Objectives: To assess the long-term complication rates (at 1 and 2 years) of patients with objectively assessed DVT compared to those observed in patients without post-operative DVT. Methods: Annual visits were performed to record the occurrence of DVT/PE, incidence of PTS, cumulative incidence rates and related predictive factors. PTS scoring were assessed using the Villalta scale (signs and symptoms). In addition in a subset of 18 out of 27 (66%) patients from South Korea with centrally adjudicated venographic DVT, a second venogram was performed at 1 year in order to verify possible spontaneous modifications of the thrombus (none of these patients had undergone any anticoagulant treatment). Results: From the 332 patients having completed the AIDA study in the 19 centres involved in the extension study, 236 patients (71.1%) agreed to participate in the extension phase and were assessed at year 1. Year 2 follow up visits were completed in May 2005. Complete data analysis of the final study results are ongoing and should be completed by September 2005. Of the 18 patients who underwent a second follow-up bilateral or unilateral ascending venography at 1 year ± 3 months post-operatively, 11 (61%) patients demonstrated resolution of the thrombus, with 3 (16%) patients showing incomplete resolution or persistence of the venous thrombosis. The venograms of the remaining four (23%) patients presented with development of collateral circulation confirming the progressive state of PTS. The majority of patients with centrally adjudicated venographic DVT demonstrated positive resolution following venographic assessment at year 1. The high incidence of thrombus resolution may have been due to the fact that most patients were diagnosed with distal DVT, which would suggest that a high percentage of DVT of the distal veins may resolve spontaneously compared to other types of DVT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→French-language works237,207→