MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993061276

TRAVELING WAVE SOLUTIONS OF THE SINE-GORDON AND THE COUPLED SINE-GORDON EQUATIONS USING THE HOMOTOPY-PERTURBATION METHOD

2009· article· en· W2993061276 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueScientia Iranica · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFractional Differential Equations Solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdomian decomposition methodSineHomotopy perturbation methodNonlinear systemSine wavePerturbation (astronomy)MathematicsMathematical analysisHomotopyHomotopy analysis methodSimple (philosophy)Applied mathematicsPartial differential equationPhysicsPure mathematicsGeometry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this research, the Homotopy-Perturbation Method (HPM) has been used for solving sine- Gordon and coupled sine-Gordon equations, which have a wide range of applications in physics. HPM deforms a dicult problem into a simple one which can be easily solved. The results obtained by HPM are then compared with those of the Adomian Decomposition Method (ADM). The method has been shown to e ectively, easily and accurately solve a large class of nonlinear problems with approximations converging rapidly to accurate solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.925
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it