MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993063854 · doi:10.29047/01225383.221

Determination of molecular masses for petroleum distillates by simualted distillation

2012· article· en· W2993063854 on OpenAlexafffund
Lante Carbognani

Bibliographic record

VenueCT&F - Ciencia Tecnología y Futuro · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsDistillationChromatographyChemistryPetroleumHydrocarbonPetroleum productMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)CalibrationSpecific gravityMineralogyOrganic chemistryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Determination of Molecular Mass (MM) for petroleum distillates is explored for selected samples viaHigh Temperature Simulated Distillation (HTSD). MM is determined as a by-product from routineHTSD carried out using open wall capillary columns coated with apolar stationary phases. No samplepre-separation into hydrocarbon group-types is required. Determined MM values were validated with resultsachieved via correlations based on specific gravity and refractive index. Furthermore, determined MM withthe former methodologies were found to match mass spectrometric determinations carried out for the basicpolar components present within the studied samples. Moreover, HTSD analyzed petroleum distillates areproposed as more representative calibration standards for size exclusion chromatographic separations, thusopening the feasibility of extrapolating MM determination for non volatile petroleum residua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCT&F - Ciencia Tecnología y FuturoSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207