AN EVALUATION OF SOLID PHASE MICROEXTRACTION FOR ANALYSIS OF ODORANT EMISSIONS FROM STORED BIOSOLIDS CAKE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Odors are a common occurrence at wastewater treatment plants, biosolids processing facilities and biosolids recycling locations. Accurate, objective measurement techniques are needed to monitor emissions, to develop new waste handling procedures and to reduce the production of the volatile gases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of solid phase microextraction for measuring common odorants that are found in biosolids facilities. The odorants were collected and concentrated by solid phase microextraction (SPME) and then quantified by gas chromatography with detection by mass spectrometry. A 75-μm Carboxen-Polydimethylsiloxane coating was used for the analysis of trimethylamine, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide and methyl mercaptan. Gaseous standards were generated for individual compounds and for dry and wet mixture from permeation apparatus. The differences in sensitivity between fibers, the competition between analytes and water vapor for the active sites on the fiber and the lack of production of artifacts make SPME suited for qualitative analysis and enables quick screening for the identification of compounds with adverse organoleptic characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".