MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993201036

The Competitive Force of FDI and Its Elements/LA COMPETITIVITE DE L'INVESTISSEMENT DIRECT VERS L'EXTERIEUR DE L'ENTREPRISE ET SES FACTEURS CONSTITUANTS

2006· article· fr· W2993201036 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Huifang Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentCompetitive advantageBusinessBusiness administrationEconomicsMarketing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: The paper provides the new concept-the competitive force of FDI, analyses its characters and elaborates its elements. It demonstrates the elements of the competitive force of FDI as a whole which put an effect on FDI. Only if enterprises own the competitive force of FDI, they can carry on FDI and get the profits. Key words: enterprise, competitive force of FDI, element Resume: Cet essai met en avant le nouveau concept de la competitivite de l'investissement direct vers l'exterieur de l'entreprise, analyse ses caracteristiques, traite ses facteurs constituants. Enfin il indique que ses facteurs, en tant qu'une unite, agit sur les activites d'investissement direct vers l'exterieur de l'entreprise et que l'entreprise ne peut investir directement vers l'exterieur et obtenir les resultats esperes qu'en se dotant de cette competitivite. Mots-Cles: entreprise, competitivite de l'investissement direct vers l'exterieur, facteurs constituants 1. INTRODUCTION Recently, there have been plenty of research papers talking about the international competitive force of enterprises. However, no paper was provided about the competitive force of FDI. Successful investment could only be obtained by the competitive force of FDI when enterprises enter into foreign market and operate in the updating competitive business context. Therefore, it is necessary to get further research on the competitive force of FDI. At the beginning, there is a short literature relier of the concept of international competitive force. Western researches and domestic researchers have not got an agreement on the understanding of international competitive force. They provided different definitions based on different directions and basements. There are two definitions which are widely accepted by researchers. In 1985, «report on the competitive force» argued that the international competitive force of enterprises is the capability and opportunity for enterprises which could provide more alternative price and quality than their foreign and domestic competitions to design, produce and sell goods and service. The World Economic Forum strengths that the international competitive force is the ability to produce goods and service in both foreign and domestic market. Price and quality are used to measure the international competitive force of enterprises are quality and price. The other one was provided by Michael. E. Porter in 1990 who is a professor in Harvard Business School (USA). The famous work «the competitive advantage of nations» argued that the international competitive force of enterprises is the capability to compete in the global market acting by global strategies. Porter strengths the importance of global strategies when enterprises are competing in the global market. The main factors influencing the international competitive forces are : competitors, suppliers, customers, potential competitive force and substitute. International competitive contain many factors concluding all business activities in the point vies of the whole process of production and operation it can be used in the competition in the domestic market when enterprises encounter competition from both domestic companies and foreign companies. It also can be used in the competitive when enterprises produce product and service in domestic market and export abroad to compete in the foreign countries. Obviously, enterprises could make use of international competitive force in the international competitions of foreign directly investment. The international competitive force is a general discussion and explanation of the capability of enterprises. However, FDI is just one aspect in the economic activities and competitive force has its special meaning when talking about FDI. Therefore, it is necessary to clear the competitive force of FDI, analyze its characters and discuss its elements deeply. 2. THE CONCEPT OF THE COMPETITIVE FORCE OF FDI According to the above analysis, it can be defined: the competitive force of FDI is the capability for enterprises to invest and operate directly, maintain the sustainable development and obtain better profit in foreign stable or changeable atmosphere, compared to other competitors. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score0.978

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207