MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Burnout in Anesthesiology and Resuscitation

2019· article· en· W2993257506 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
E. V. Sinbukhova, A. Y. Lubnin, K. A. Popugayev

Bibliographic record

VenueRussian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical Care · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBurnoutEmotional exhaustionAnesthesiologyIntensive careMedicineAnxietyPsychologyFamily medicineNursingPsychiatryClinical psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background . The term “burnout” was originally developed by the psychologist Herbert Freudenberg (Germany, USA) in the seventies of the last century. Then another psychologist, Christina Maslach was a co-author of the Maslach Burnout Inventory, which was adapted to different professions and translated into different languages. According to Russian scientist professor Victor V Boyko “the emotional burnout is a form of professional distortion of an individual ...”. Anesthesiology and resuscitation are certainly among the most stressful medical disciplines, daily exposing doctors to high responsibility associated with life-threatening scenarios of patients. Therefore, burnout detection is important because it is related to the safety and quality of medical care, as well as to the life and health of intensive care specialists. Aim of study Anonymous, blind observational study of the frequency and dynamics of burnout, depression, situational and personal anxiety of anesthesiologists and resuscitation doctors and nurses of anesthesiology and intensive care departments. Material and methods. The study included 64 specialists of anesthesiology and intensive care departments (41 doctors and 23 nurses). Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) for Medical Personnel, Purpose in life test (Crumbaugh & Maholick, 1964), “Burnout” questionnaire of V. V. Boyko, Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) in the adaptation by Y L. Khanin, Assessment of depression (HADS), and a series of general questions (gender, age, profession, working experience, marital status, number of working hours per week, how much do I love my job, how much I would like to love my job, somatic complaints, etc.). Results. According to MBI, 65.9% of examined doctors and 43.5% of nurses have high rates of certain burnout, which confirms the relevance of the studied problem. Of these, 12.19% of doctors and 8.7% of nurses have high rates of all three sub-scales of burnout syndrome. Depression, personal and situational anxiety have a positive correlation with burnout. Conclusion. According to the literature, burnout leads to a steady decrease in work productivity, destructive behavior, emergence of a variety of psychosomatic disorders, and a sense of meaninglessness of existence, despair, suicidal thoughts and committed suicides at the final stage of burnout. It is necessary to conduct regular testing of intensive care specialists to detect burnout, depression and anxiety. When the burnout is identified, it is necessary to perform psychological interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRussian Sklifosovsky Journal Emergency Medical CareSame topicHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutFrench-language works237,207