MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993308677

Bose-Einsteinova kondenzacija

2019· dissertation· sl· W2993308677 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julia Petrović

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagesl
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Mechanics and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bose - Einsteinova kondenzacija je specificna vrsta faznog prijelaza preko koje je omoguceno proucavanje kvantnih efekata na makroskopskoj razini. Takav prijelaz karakterizira pad velikog broja bozona u osnovno stanje i opserviranje velikog vala materije. Teorija pretpostavljena od strane Alberta Einsteina dvadesetih godina 20. stoljeca daje statisticku pozadinu o ponasanju plina bozona nakon sto se temperatura sustava smanji ispod kriticne temperature. Da bi se mogla razviti intuitivna percepcija o prelasku iz obicnog Boseovog plina u Bose - Einsteinov kondenzat, krece se od uvođenja de Broglieve valne duljine te objasnjava kako ona postaje sve veca snižavanjem temperature sustava. Potom kvantno - statisticki koncept daje konkretan izracun i objasnjenje kriticne temperature. Predstavlja se pojednostavljeni teorijski model za Bose - Einsteinov kondenzat preko Gross - Pitaevskii jednadžbe, uz pobliže objasnjenje kroz rasprsenje hladnih atoma i definiranje duljine rasprsenja za nisko temperaturni sustav bozona. Nakon teorijskog objasnjenja daje se povijesni pregled teorijskih i eksperimentalnih radova koji su prethodili realizaciji Bose - Einsteinove kondenzacije, a usko su povezani s njom. Na kraju su opisane tehnike hlađenja sustava bozona te rezultati prvog postizanja kondenzata.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207