MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993318716

The Charter at 30: A Reflection

2012· article· fr· W2993318716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John D. Whyte

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue d'études constitutionnelles · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJudicial and Constitutional Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCharterConstitutionalismTransformative learningConstitutionJurisprudencePolitical scienceLawPoliticsState (computer science)Constitutional lawReflection (computer programming)SociologyDemocracy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The addition of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms1 to Canadian constitutionalism was transformative, bringing to the fore a constitutional relationship that, although not entirely absent, had been considerably overshadowed by the focus on institutional and jurisdictional structures and relationships. The new paradigm—a range of constitution-based controls of the relationship between state and citizen—not only shifted a significant class of personal interests from the domain of politics to that of law, it also generated a feedback effect on Canadian constitutional jurisprudence, an effect that might be considered, not altogether flatteringly, modernizing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0070.006
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue d'études constitutionnellesSame topicJudicial and Constitutional StudiesFrench-language works237,207