Bir Amerikan Ticari Teşebbüsü ve Bir Osmanlı Kentini Okuma Çabası: Doğu Akdeniz Ticaret Dergisi ve İzmir (1911- 1914)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article is based on a meticulous study of the Ottoman-American economic relations in the Levant Trade Review (1911-1931), published by the American Chamber of Commerce for the Levant, upon realizing that the Levant Trade Review might possibly shed some light on the history of the city of Smyrna. Thus, observations and reports which were penned by authorities such as the chamber of commerce, consulates and educators, enabled researchers to read about cityies trade centers’ socio-economic structures and natures during their transformation period. This period was determined by the development of the Turco Italian War of 1911-1912 and the Balkan Wars following the first publication of the journal in 1911. Thus, in terms of apperceiving the economical dynamics of the era, examining Smyrna through its commercial activities with the USA (which had a strong and steady position in the world’s economy in the first quarter of the 20th century) was considered to be significant as one of the three important economical centers of Ottoman State, With this aim, the dimensions of the social and economic life of Smyrna, based on the Levant Trade Review, are used to give visibility to the period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".