MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993419392 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v22i2.973

Between hope and despair: Women learning politics. Donna M. Chovanec. Fernwood Publishing, Blackpoint, NS, 2009, 128 pages.

2010· article· en· W2993419392 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Shauna Butterwick

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender Politics and Representation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPublishingPoliticsSociologyMedia studiesGender studiesArtPolitical scienceLawLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

professor at the University of Alberta, has written about her long-term research connection with women anti-dictatorship activists living in Arica, Chile, the country's most northern coastal city.Early in the book, Chovanec offers a succinct summary of Chile's long history of oppression, also pointing to the equally significant history of resistance and dissent through labour, women's, and indigenous movements.Through interviews, she explores (with depth and great detail) the retrospective reflections of the women of Arica about the past and their contributions to the battle for freedom that took place after the overthrow of Allende's socialist government in 1973, which was followed by a brutal repressive military dictatorship led by General Augusto Pinochet.Thousands were assassinated and exiled.Chovanec reminds us that Pinochet's repressive regime was part of a long-standing process of colonization, which has left its mark throughout Latin America.Forced underground by the military dictatorship, many Chilean citizens lived in fear until the early 1980s, when protests began to reemerge with women at the forefront.This book tells the story of their courage, tactics, and strategies, as well as the long-term impact on these women of their engagement.The book makes a significant contribution to the scholarship of learning in social movements, an important area of inquiry in the field of adult education.The book is divided into two parts.In Part One, Chovanec focuses on the data, organizing her analysis into four sections, or acts, while in Part Two, she considers the case in light of current theorizing about social movement learning.In the first act (Los Antecendentes) of Part One, Chovanec maps the background and the family and social contexts that influenced the women's activism.Readers will be drawn into the geography of Arica as Chovanec provides a thick description of the setting, giving us a sense of the geography, street scenes, houses, markets, and businesses of the city.We learn how family and, in particular, the democratic and socialist orientations of many in this northern city were significant spheres of learning for these women.Municipal politics, richly informed by leftist approaches, also influenced their activism.The second act (La Lucha, or the struggle) outlines the different activities and women's experiences during the anti-dictatorship movement, beginning with the first meeting in 1983 and ending in 1990 when the dictatorship was finally overthrown.We learn there were two women's organizations: MODEMU and CEDEMU.The first was the largest group and oriented to leftist politics, while the second was smaller and more explicitly feminist.At times their activities came together, and in 1984 efforts were made to create a new organization, Women for Democracy, which folded after three years.Along with very public activities such as protests and disruptions of meetings, underground strategies such as creating and distributing anti-dictatorship materials, spray-painting, and bomb-making took place.Many communal survival efforts, such as collective kitchens, were also initiated and were

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.171
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationSame topicGender Politics and RepresentationFrench-language works237,207