Study on the Improvement of Teaching Quality Management System for Higher Engineering Institutes1/ETUDE DE L'AMELIORATION DU SYSTEME DE GESTION DE LA QUALITE D'ENSEIGNEMENT POUR LES INSTITUTS D'INGENIERIE SUPERIEURS
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Based on the analysis of its establishment and implementation of controlling scheme of the teaching quality management system (TQMS) for advanced institutes of technologies domestic and overseas, from the inspect of the management principles of TQM and 6 σ as well as the process method of ISO9000 family standards, in combination with the evolution scheme of teaching quality of undergraduate courses in ordinary universities, applying the running principles of PDCA ,this paper has probed into the objectives of the establishment and improvement of the management system on teaching quality, put forward its basic procedures. We believe that its establishment and maintenance should have four stages, namely, plan, do, check and action, as well as eight steps, which includes decision-making, programming, analysis, design, running, assessing, improvement and perfection, which, lays a solid foundation on concrete teaching quality assurance programs for its improvement. Key words: quality management system, procedure improvement, implementation and maintenance, continual improvement, institutes of technology. Resume: Base sur l'analyse de l'etablissement et de l'application du plan de controle du systeme de gestion de la qualite d'enseignement pour les instituts de technologie superieurs tant nationaux qu' etrangers, a partir de l'examination des principes de gestion de ce systeme et de 6 σ ainsi que la methode de traitement des standards familial ISO9000, en combinaison avec l'evolution du systeme de la qualite d'enseignement des cours universitaires dans les universites ordinaires, en applicant les principes de PDCA, cet essai explore les objectifs de l'etablissement et de l'amelioration du systeme de gestion de la qualite d'enseignement et met en avant ses procedures de base. On croit que son etablissement et maintenance devrait comporter quatre etapes, soit plan, application, revision et action, et huit pas qui comprennent prise de decision, programmation, analyse, design, application, evaluation, amelioration et perfection, qui, jette une base solide avec des programmes concrets d'assurance de la qualite d'enseignement pour son amelioration. Mots-Cles: systeme de gestion de la qualite, procedure d'amelioration, application et maintenance, amelioration continuelle, instituts de technologie 1. INTRODUCTION TQMS refers to the management system of coordinating and dominating organizations in terms of teaching quality level.5 At present, our higher education is experiencing the transition from extractive education to popular education, leading to the relative drop in teaching quality compared with its enrollment expansion. Therefore, a teaching quality management system with perfect rales and coordinated sectors is increasingly important for universities, and it is of great need to learn from higher educational experience in other countries, to positively introduce the advanced educational modes and methods, as well as to intake for reference the ISO9000 family standards, TQM and 6 σ management principles and modes successfully applied to enterprise management. Some researchers concerned have analyzed the feasibility and applicability of introducing the ISO9000 family standards in educational management for universities, described its new principles based on TQM and ISO9000 family standards, explored the key points in implementing the ISO9000 family standards for universities, and put forward the main processes and procedures for compiling necessary documents. They even did the research about the four procedures of its product realization during the educational and teaching service: reorganization and identification of its customers and social needs, design and exploration, purchasing, as well as planning, identification and controlling of operation process in teaching and teaching service. Moreover, they measured and analyzed the training requirements and the feasibility of the continual improvement of the quality management system, and testified their improved programs. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it