MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993682526 · doi:10.56105/cjsae.v21i2.1074

Practices on the Periphery: Highly educated Chinese immigrant women negotiating occupational settlement in Canada

2009· article· en· W2993682526 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Hongxia Shan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult Education · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLabor Movements and Unions
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Christian StudiesUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)ImmigrationNegotiationGender studiesMigrant workersSociologyPolitical scienceGeographyEconomic growthBusinessSocial scienceArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Employing a situated learning framework, I examine how 10 Chinese immigrant omen negotiated their occupational settlement in Canada. I argue for a mutually constitutive relationship between the women’s employment strategies and Canadian workplace practices, the accessibility and receptivity of which are shaped by social relations such as gender, race, and perceived language differences. Specifically, I examine the women’s practices in positioning themselves vis-à-vis the Canadian labour market and their “legitimate” peripheral practices in Canadian workplaces. I show that central to the women’s labour market positioning practices is a process of identity construction that is in ongoing interplay with exclusionary labour market practices. Further, provided with little support at their new workplaces, the women often resorted to strategic tolerance, relied on prior knowledge and expertise, and became agents of change. The legitimate space presupposed in situated learning was an entitlement that the women had to earn in Canada. Résumé En partant d’un cadre conceptuel d’apprentissage contextualisé, j étudie un groupe de 10 chinoises immigrantes qui négocient leur adaptation professionnelle au Canada. Je me base sur l hypothèse d’une relation constitutive mutuelle entre les stratégies d emploi des femmes et les pratiques d’emploi sur le marché canadien où les questions d accessibilité et de réceptivité sont sujettes aux relations sociales telles que le sexe, la race et les différences langagières perçues. Spécifiqueme j’étudie la façon dont ces femmes se positionnent vis-à-vis le marché du travail canadien et leurs pratiques parallèles légitimes au sein de leurs lieux de travail. Je démontre qu au centre des efforts d’adaptation professionnelle de ces femmes se déroule un processus de construction identitaire continuel tributaire des pratiques d’exclusion du marché du travail. De plus, les immigrantes chinoises, laissées à elles-mêmes dans leur nouveau poste de travail, sans un réseau de soutien, ont développées des stratégies de tolerance. Elles ont dù se fier à leur bagage de connaissances et a leur expériences acquises antérieurement et sont devenu des agentes de changement.La place légitime présumée dans la situation d apprentissage contextualisé est un droit que les femmes ont du gagner d ellemêmes au Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0300.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal for the Study of Adult EducationSame topicLabor Movements and UnionsFrench-language works237,207