Does structure affect biological function? Modifications to the protein and phospholipids fraction of the milk fat globule membrane after extraction affect the antiproliferative activity of colon cancer cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, the known antiproliferative activity of the untreated milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) against human colon cancer cells was employed to test the hypothesis that the supramolecular structure of the MFGM is of important biological significance. The results indicated that there is a relationship between the extent of thermal denaturation and the loss of antiproliferative capacity. There was also a clear reduction of the biological activity, when the MFGM was treated by hydrolysis using trypsin or phospholipase A2, enzymes specific either for the protein or the phospholipids components present in the MFGM. It was concluded that the bioactivity of the MFGM can not be explained only by the presence of bioactive components, but that their structural organization plays a critical role in the antiproliferative activities of the extracts. Practical applications The milk fat globule membrane (MFGM) is characterized by a complex composition and structure, with biological significance. It is known that with processing, the composition of the MFGM is modified, due to protein–protein interactions at the interface. In this work, the MFGM was isolated from untreated milk and while maintaining its overall composition, its molecular and supramolecular structures were modified using heating or specific hydrolysis to the protein or phospholipids’ components. All targeted modifications affected the bioefficacy of the MFGM against colon cancer cells, thus demonstrating the importance of processing history on the functionality of the MFGM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".