La crise de la théâtralité dans l’Eden Cinéma de Marguerite Duras: entre éclatement des codes dramaturgiques et mise en pièce du corps vieillissant, le corps jeune comme signe d’un renouveau théâtral.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Por su estructura que a la vez es novedosa y transgrede los códigos clásicos de la dramaturgia, el Eden cinéma de Marguerite Duras contribue a la renovacion del genero teatral. El cuento hibrido y desconstruido, por el medio del lenguajé y de la representación, que mescla diferentes temporalidades y que alia cuerpo vivo y cuerpo cadaverico, cuerpo joven y cuerpo envejecido plantea la manera sobre que un cuerpo puede desparecer para dar lugar al renacimiento. With it's innovative and transgressive structure, L’Eden Cinéma, written by Marguerite Duras is participating in the renewal of the the theatrical genre. By mixing several temporalities and associating, bodies young and aging, « cadaverisés» and alive, the fable, hybrid and destructured, evokes through language and represantation how a body (of a person but also of a text) car disapear to leave a renewal in its place. Par sa structure à la fois novatrice et transgressive des codes dramaturgiques classiques, L’Eden Cinéma de Marguerite Duras, participe au renouvellement du genre théâtral. Mêlant différentes temporalités et alliant corps vivant et corps cadavérisé, corps jeune et corps vieillissant, la fable, hybride et déstructurée, évoque par le biais du langage et de la représentation comment un corps (ou un corpus) peut disparaître pour laisser place au renouveau.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".