MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993843600 · doi:10.4000/nrt.6408

Nick Srnicek, Le capitalisme de plateforme. L’hégémonie de l’économie numérique, Montréal, Lux, 2018, 154 p.

2019· article· fr· W2993843600 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie-Anne Dujarier

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Nouvelle revue du travail · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Economy and Work Transformation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ce petit ouvrage est la traduction française, par Philippe Blouin, d’un texte publié en 2017 (Plateform capitalism, Polity Press). Nick Srnicek est un philosophe britannique et aussi un militant « de gauche », fidèle à Marx. Il avait écrit avec Alex Williams un livre (Inventing the Future. Postcapitalism and a World Without Work, Verso, 2015) et des articles en français (2014 et 2016) qui prônent un « imaginaire post travail », « post capitaliste », grâce à l’automation du travail, la suppre...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.772
Threshold uncertainty score0.453

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Nouvelle revue du travailSame topicDigital Economy and Work TransformationFrench-language works237,207