MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993894057 · doi:10.3749/canmin.1900028

The genesis of agates and amethyst geodes

2019· article· en· W2993894057 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
I. N. Kigai

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMineralogy and Gemology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLavaAndesiteMineralogyPercolation (cognitive psychology)GeologySupercritical fluidChemistryGeochemistryVolcanoVolcanic rock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Practically all aspects of agate genesis generate debate. The time is ripe to clarify the most important enigmas concerning the environments of formation of agates and the related famous amethyst geodes of Brazil and Uruguay. Agates form over a wide range of temperatures, from those of basaltic and andesitic melts (about 1100 °C) down to about 50 °C, and at rather low pressures. Their formation in liquid mafic magmas is indicated by a correlation between (1) the orientation of amygdules and the inclination of onyx banding in them and (2) the attitude of amygdules in the lava flow layers. The correlation arises because lava moves at a different rate close to and far from the upper and lower rims of a flow. The alkaline supercritical fluid fills gas vesicles in lavas and dissolves silica, mainly, from ambient lava or rock to produce a silica sol. If the pressure on the fluid causes percolation of water from amygdules, the sol coagulates on the walls of the vesicle to form a concentric lining. If the pressure in amygdules falls below the maximum osmotic pressure of a sol (about 0.1 MPa for a silica sol), percolation of fluid stops, and coagulation leads to the formation of horizontal onyx banding. Multiple repetitions of precipitation of various gel layers can be caused by overlapping fresh flows upon the cooling older agate-bearing lava flow. In a submarine setting, phase separation of the fluid and the formation of a film of gel between vapor (or diluted solution) and brine stimulate the osmotic processes, which result in growth of hollow membrane tubes and branching moss-like arrays at the bottom of amygdules. Some agates exhibit numerous channels as a result of repeated extrusion of fluid or gel from inner zones to the periphery of amygdules that were compressed under the burden of new flows. Previously, such channels were interpreted to be feeding channels for silica supply in amygdules. Periodic compression of amygdules after percolation of fluid from them requires no additional supply of silica because the volume of the amygdules is reduced in proportion to the loss of fluid. The concentric and horizontal banding and mossy textures of agates from the lithophysae of felsic volcanic rocks were created during active volcanism as well. The agates from dissolution-induced cavities in carbonate rocks and the famous amethyst druses of Brazil and Uruguay formed at the moderate temperatures associated with low-grade burial metamorphism, as indicated by the lack of moss textures and onyx banding.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.223
Threshold uncertainty score0.370

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicMineralogy and Gemology StudiesFrench-language works237,207