MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

USE OF MELDONIUM IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE AND CONCOMITANT ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION

2019· article· en· W2993903959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D.A. Volynskyi, Vakaliuk Ip

Bibliographic record

VenueEUREKA Health Sciences · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConcomitantCoronary artery diseaseCardiologyInternal medicineCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyAnginaBlood pressureMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of mortality and disability in Ukraine. Arterial hypertension (AH) is one of the most common diseases and a leading risk factor for coronary artery disease. The aim of the work is to evaluate the antianginal activity of meldonium in the complex therapy in patients with CAD with stable angina and concomitant AH. Materials and methods. The study included 82 patients with CAD, stable angina pectoris II–III functional class, including 52 patients with concomitant AH stage II. The patients were divided into 2 groups. Patients in group 1 were prescribed meldonium at a dose of 750 mg/d for 2 months in addition to basic therapy for the underlying disease. Patients in group 2 continued basic antianginal, disaggregant, hypolipidemic therapy. Results. The use of meldonium led to a decrease in the frequency of angina attacks and the need for nitroglycerin. From the 1st month of therapy and up to 2 months treatment decreased it consumption by 63 and 82.3 % respectively. Adding meldonium to basic therapy led to a likely reduction in shortness of breath, episodes of palpitations, tinnitus, and headache. In all patients, after the treatment, an increase in exercise tolerance was observed, which was more pronounced in the group where patients were receiving meldonium. In the group of patients receiving meldonium, normalisation of blood pressure was faster and more pronounced. Conclusions. Meldonium has antianginal activity, which is manifested by an increase in the physical tolerance of patients, a decrease in the frequency of angina attacks, the need for sublingual nitroglycerin intake and improvement in the well-being of patients. Additional use of meldonium promotes faster and better normalization of blood pressure. The use of meldonium in the complex therapy of patients with stable angina and concomitant AH allows to increase the effectiveness of traditional antianginal therapy and to improve the quality of life of such patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.183

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEUREKA Health SciencesSame topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207