MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2993941050 · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.9b01130

The Effects of High Pressure and High Temperature in Semidilute Aqueous Cellulose Nanocrystal Suspensions

2019· article· en· W2993941050 on OpenAlexafffund
Sudeshna Saha, Usha D. Hemraz, Yaman Boluk

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomacromolecules · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersInnotech AlbertaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsNanocrystalSuspension (topology)ViscosityAqueous suspensionCelluloseChemical engineeringAqueous solutionMaterials scienceColloidRheologyVolume (thermodynamics)Self-healing hydrogelsChemistryPolymer chemistryNanotechnologyComposite materialOrganic chemistryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A semidilute cellulose nanocrystal suspension was tested for pressure, volume, temperature dependencies of its viscosity and density. The compression of a 2.0 wt % cellulose nanocrystal suspension under 5.0 MPa at room temperature resulted in morphological changes from istotropic to nematic form. However, at high temperature, high-pressure treatment caused desulfation and gelation. Those results have significant applications, not only as additives in drilling and fracturing fluids but also for the preparation of hydrogels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiomacromoleculesSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207